Understanding Remediation

Remedation is the remediation of other *things*. It gives the viewer the option of seeing the current version and previous versions of the work, while creating a new version. Remixing is similar to remediation, as it is the alternate version of the original.

For my project audience in my research paper, I think remediating my project would be great. It already has a lot of information in it to persuade, but also remediating it to make it seem original would make it even more persuasive. I’m not exactly sure how I will be able to do this, which is why i have peers and other resources, and I’m also not sure if the audience would remain the same or if it would change.

At this point I think I have a brief understanding about what remediation and remixing are, but then again in the back of my mind I don’t and the examples given in the website looked difficult to do with the topic I have. I just don’t even know where to start and how to go about this project.

 

An Interview with Sonia Sotomayor

I think that  Sotomayor values writing skill in both students and prospective lawyers because it shows that they have an education and are representing everything that they have gotten out of their education.

I think that legal writing—or any type of writing— does need to be persuasive. Like Sotomayor said in the interview, you can’t just state a fact and say its true just because it is, but you have to explain it in a legal way to persuade others. In order to start arguements, you need persuasion.

I believe that Sotomayor believes in a liberal arts education because it is to understand the basics of government and law. It is important because that is all the country is run on, and you need to have an understanding of it. I believe the more classes you take in college with help better your education, because you have a broader knowledge of several different disciplines. The more different classes you take, the more educated you will become of the world around you.

Lastly I found it interesting that Sotomayor had no intentions of becaoming who she is now when she first started college. All she had said was that she wanted to take many different classes and sure enough she got hooked on the path to where she is today.

 

Reflection

So far my writing process is going fairly well. Didn’t do my outline in the correct format, but the actual paper is going well. Only thing is that my topic is very straight forward and that it may be pretty short for a persuasive essay… I did struggle for a little finding credible sources to use for my paper. It was hard to find exactly what I needed from the articles or from the books.  Every article or book only had a small portion of it that related to my paper. I got help from a few classmeates and friends in my dorm that helped me out quite significantly. I think that Zinsser’s article will help in my papers because I use to have a tendency to just bunch a lot of ideas together, or to try to sound too scholarly which doesn’t sound anything like i would do. I just need to be as professional and I can be to prove it is my voice in the paper.

I personally don’t like research papers. They are extensive, frustrating, and professors make you feel like you don’t know what you are talking about sometimes because you gathered the wrong information. I don’t see why we can’t just learn about the topic we have to do research on in class and instead of doing a paper, just give a quiz or a small test to determine the students understanding of a subject.

Why do we do academic research?

Research is important in our lives because it allows us to pursue our interests, to learn something new, to hone our problem-solving skills and to challenge ourselves in new ways. Working on a research project gives you the opportunity work closely with a mentor–a faculty member or other experienced researcher.  After you have finished the research project, you leave with a product that represents the distillation of your interests and studies, and possibly, a real contribution to knowledge.

Every field of study has its own research problems and methods. As a researcher you seek answers to questions of great interest to you. In biology, (my major), there are many different ways to do research. What ever way you do it, the information you get out from it will improve your knowledge not just for the study, but just to know  in your personal life, because it is always great learning something new.

 

Blog Entry #3: Shitty First Drafts & Responding to Other Students’ Writing

“Shitty First Drafts” – In this essay, Lamott is speaking to a very broad audience it seems. It appears as if she is writing to anyone who is having to write or type up something. I say this because I know a majority of people who struggle with starting off a papr for school, and this essay points to those who do struggle.

“Responding—Really Responding—to Other Students’ Writing.” -The audience that Straub is writing to is those who struggle with giving helpful advice for their paper, or just help with any writing in general. He talks bout how when commenting on someones work, that you should give as much advice as possible to help make it better. Also, he explains that when responding, give as much details as you can, meaning that you are to the point with what you are trying to say.

I personally feel like I can already be a better writer just after reading these two pieces. They both give information that can help a lot not only in our english class writing our essays, but also in other classes, or even professional work areas. I learned that everyone does write a “shitty first draft” and I don’t feel as bad about writing a bad draft. But I also learned about how to look at my paper to help narrow all of the facts down to improve for my second draft. Trying to get thoughts down is always a struggle for me, and after reading the essay by Lamott, I now have a better approach to have to my drafts for any essay. What I learned in Straub’s essay, is to how to apprach giving advice to someone on their paper. Getting thoughts down on paper isn’t my only struggle, but giving feedback is another. It is hard for me to grasp sometimes what it is someone is saying, and I sometimes don’t know how to say it. After reading what Straub had said, I know now how to kind of go after giving feedback on someones paper, and how to help as much as I can. 

I like how Straub made this comment in his piece, “Try to imitate the teacher. Mark what he’d mark and sound like he’d sound. But be cool about it. Don’t praise anything really, but no need to get harsh or cut throat either. Get in and get out. You’re okay, I’m okay. Everybody’s happy. What’s the problem?” I found this interesting because it is how I feel sometimes when commenting on a student’s paper. Sometimes I strongly disagree with a comment they put in, but I remember that it is not my paper, and I can’t change their writing. I simply just have to correct the grammatical errors, make a few comments, and give it back.

I like how Lamott had explained how she got her ideas from the conversations she heard from her friends at the restaurant, down to paper. I found this entire paragraph interesting because she talks about the stress she has about creating a draft, and about how she has to cross so much out until she can get a successful draft going. I just found it interesting because it may be something i try out in the future when trying to write a draft and am struggling getting my ideas and thoughts into one good sounding draft.

Aristotle Book I Part II

The three modes of persuasion that Aristotle refers to in Rhetoric Part II of
Book I are personal character of the speaker. The second is putting the audience
into a certain frame of mind. The third mode of persuasion is the apparent of
proof. The modes relate to writers today and are the guidelines writers should
follow when persuading someone in things such as global warming and things like politics. The character of the writer is very important, because no one will believe someone who lies and won’t admit to things that they’ve done in the past. The second mode tells us that we should focus on the audience we are speaking to. The third mode is important to writers today because if you don’t have proof to what you say, then no one will take your reasons seriously.

Enthymeme: An argument in which one premise is not explicitly stated.

There are three conventional orders of enthymemes. A first-order enthymeme suppresses the major premise. A second-order enthymeme suppresses the minor premise. A third-order enthymeme suppresses the conclusion. Other orders of enthymemes, in which 2 elements of the syllogism are suppressed, could be postulated.

Syllogism: is a kind of logical argument in which one proposition (the conclusion) is inferred from two or more others (the premises) of a specific form.

A categorical syllogism consists of three parts:
■Major premise
■Minor premise
■Conclusion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthymeme

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism